Trump: So who will be the Apprentice?


Friday, January 20, 2017 // Written by Enzio von Pfeil

So who will be teaching whom as of today in America?  Who gets fired first? 

  1. Inertia

    Trump will run the country like he ran his reality TV show, "The Apprentice": nothing got done, but plenty got fired.  Nothing got done because this visceral, pugnacious TV host is a master at antagonizing everyone. Let's sketch  some such virulently entertaining  theatres: White House staff , ethics, Congress, economic policy, intelligence, and  foreign policy.
  2. The White House staff

    How will his triumvirate get along internally? Can you really see his 36-year-old son-in-law, Jared Kushner, hitting it off with feisty counsellor Steve Bannon or Chief of Staff Rence Priebus? Who will get fired first? Surely not Jared or Ivanka.
  3. Ethics

    Remember all of that internecine fighting about Trump's (lacking) ethics?  Just on 12th January 2017 his tax lawyer proclaimed that he would not get rid of his corporate assets or place them in to a blind trust; instead, the Trump Organisation (an oxymoron?) would be given to his sons in the form of a trust...
  4. Congress

    If I learned one thing from my few years of working with the Hill, it is how combative its occupants are. In short: just because the Republicans rule the roost in both Chambers does not mean at all that all Republicans speak with one voice!  Remember how fraught relations in this Party were before finally "uniting" (leerily) behind Trump?  My hunch is that he will antagonize so many members of Congress that they won't play ball, they will refuse to pass  his legislative proposals.  And remember that he cannot just spew-out "Executive orders" day and night.....So: who will get sidelined first? Trump the Grump, or Congressional "team" players?
  5.  

    Economic policy

    Contradictions abound even before Trump & Co have reached  first base!  In the Financial Times (FT) of 20th January 217 p. 1, we read that Trump wants a weaker dollar whilst his designated Secretary of the Treasury, Steven Mnuchin, wants a stronger dollar. That is a pretty fundamental policy rift, one based on the myth that weak exchange rates boost exports (see my more recent book, Trade Myths, for more.)  Next to dollar-fights, watch Trump's other economic policy-makers fight it out, too: free-trade adversaries will face-off with more market-orientated advisers.  According to the Asian Wall Street Journal  (AWSJ) of 10th January 2017, China-hater  and general free-trade hawk Peter Navarro will lead the National Trade Council: label him the leader of Trump's free-trade adversaries. At the other end of the spectrum are the more market-orientated advisers such as Gary Cohn, the boss of the National Economic Council. As noted in the AWSJ, "A flat organizational structure could set these and other individuals against each other as they compete for Mr. Trump's support." So who gets fired first: free-trade adversaries, or free-market proponents?
  6. Intelligence

    We hardly need refresh memories about how pugnaciously Trump already has lashed-out at his nation's spy agencies   Having antagonized them, how can his intelligence agencies possibly be happy to support his domestic, anti-terror, as well as foreign policy?  So who gets fired first among his domestic and foreign-focused  intelligence agencies?
  7. Foreign policy

    And don't think for a minute that his designated Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, will be singing from the Trump hymn book.  Tillerson agrees with the findings of America's intelligence agencies when it comes to the hacking of Democrats' files; Trump grudgingly  conceded the point.  Already we read that Tillerson is a hawk on Moscow, whilst Trump is a Putin dove (or puppy?)  Tillerson does not want a blanket ban on Muslims entering the US; Trump, however, does.  And Tillerson wants to go softly on Saudi Arabia's human rights abuses, whilst on the campaign trail, Trump attacked the Saudis' human rights record. Meanwhile, there is that MIke  Flynn chomping at the bit. ,m So who gets fired first?
  8. Evidence-based investment implication

    Research suggests that President's don't really influence the direction of markets; the Economic Time®, however, does.  And we remain sanguine about improvements to America's.  But watch volatility soar with this impetuous, pugnacious President.  This means that Fama-French's size and value factors will provide plenty of buying opportunities.  Sun-Tzu quipped that victorious warriors win the war first and then go to war; meanwhile, defeated warriors go to war first, and only then seek to win.  Who gets fired (or assassinated) first?

Share this post:

DISCLAIMER: THIS BLOG DOES NOT PROVIDE INVESTMENT ADVICE

The information, including but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material contained on this blog are for informational purposes only and do not necessarily reflect the views or Enzio von Pfeil. The purpose of this blog is to promote broader understanding, knowledge and awareness of various financial and economic topics. It is not intended to be a substitute for regulated professional investment advice. Always seek the advice of your a regulated investment advisor with any questions you may have regarding your specific investment needs or concerns.

Enzio von Pfeil does not recommend or endorse any strategies or ideas mentioned in this blog. Reliance on any information appearing in this blog is solely at your own risk.

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ, UNDERSTAND, AND AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THESE TERMS WHEN VIEWING, READING OR OBSERVING ANY INFORMATION, DATA OR ANY OTHER FORM OF COMMUNICATION ON THIS BLOG:

Any information provided to you by us, including any promotional material such as photographs, written descriptions, any plans or models, any income estimates or projections (“Information”) have been provided to us by other sources and although we aim to perform due diligence on all information we provide to our Blog subscribers, the Information is provided for general purposes only, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the Information and we do not make any representations, either express or implied, as to the accuracy as to the Information. We recommend that our Blog subscribers undertake their own due diligence in relation to the asset they are considering purchasing, including seeking independent legal and financial advice in relation to their own financial objectives and personal circumstances, prior to signing any agreement or contract with any third parties.

No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy, likelihood of achievement or reasonableness of any figures, forecasts, prospects or returns (if any) contained in the message. Such figures, forecasts, prospects or returns are by their nature subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies. The assumptions and parameters used by www.enziovonpfeil.com (evp.com) are not the only ones that might reasonably have been selected and therefore evp.com does not guarantee the sequence, accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the information provided herein. None of evp.com, its members or any of their employees or directors shall be held liable, in any way, for any claims, mistakes, errors or otherwise arising out of or in connection with the content of any form of communication, documentation included in the Blog, via e-mail or any other form of communication.

You are reminded that the content is for personal use and general information only. Under no circumstances is the content intended for and hence the content should not be regarded as an offer or solicitation or recommendation to dispose/sell, an offer or solicitation or recommendation to subscribe in, nor an offer or solicitation or recommendation to buy/acquire and under no circumstances should the content be constituted as provision of any recommendation or investment advice on any securities, investment products, investment arrangements and any other form of investments or legal, tax or other professional advice and therefore should not be relied upon in that regard for making any decision. Unless specifically stated, neither the information nor any opinion contained herein constitutes as an advertisement, an invitation, a solicitation, a recommendation or advice to buy or sell any products, services, securities, futures, options, other financial instruments or provide any investment advice or service by evp.com.

Unless stated otherwise, any opinions or views expressed in this communication may not represent those of evp.com. Opinions or views expressed in this communication may differ from those of other departments or third parties, including any opinions or views expressed in any research issued by evp.com.

Any e-mail and any accompanying attachments are not encrypted and cannot be guaranteed to be secure, complete or error-free as electronic communications may be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, delayed or incomplete, and/or may contain viruses. EvP.com, therefore, does not accept any liability for any interception, corruption, loss, destruction, incompleteness, viruses, errors, omissions or delays in relation to this electronic communication. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Electronic communications carried within the evp.com system may be monitored. Any communication or message in email form or otherwise may contain confidential information. Any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of the relevant information outside the original recipients of any messages  is strictly prohibited. If you receive a message by mistake, please notify the sender by reply email immediately and permanently delete the emails and its contents. Unless otherwise stated, any communication provided is solely for information purposes only.