US, China, Japan & Viet Nam

Thursday, June 02, 2016 // Written by Enzio von Pfeil

Buy America and Viet Nam; sell China, Hong Kong and Japan 


US manufacturing has expanded for the third consecutive month in May. The Institute for Supply Management’s manufacturing index rose to 51.3 in May from 50.8 the month prior, easily beating economists’ forecasts of a reading of 50.3.

The Fed’s Beige Book shows economic activity improving modestly in the US but notes tightening labour markets in nearly all regions and modestly rising wages.

Bond manager PIMCO has now added its voice to calls for caution following Blackrock’s warning on overvalued global markets and risks yesterday. PIMCO strategists warn that exploding debt levels along with central bank policies — zero and negative interest rates and trillions of dollars’ worth of money printing — threaten to upset global stability. They go on to warn of “monetary policy exhaustion” and say loose monetary policy has lost its bite, threaten the global recovery and "the costs of unconventional policy are rising."

  1. Framework

     America’s Economic Time® keeps improving in cyclical fashion: her previous “excess supply of goods” is morphing in to an “excess demand for goods”. That begets inflationary fears of “too much money chasing too few goods”, so the Fed wants to tighten or – in the jargon of our Economic Clock® - to morph the previous excess supply of money into an excess demand for money.
  2. Inflationary pressures are anachronistic

     I remain un-convinced that the old “too much money chasing too few goods” really holds. Thus, whether wages really MUST become inflationary:
    1. First,.thanks to MNCs & technology, the global supply curve is infinite: stuff can be produced literally anywhere, so that
    2. Secondly, the US domestic labour force’s bargaining power falls-off, and
    3. Thirdly, tech means productivity gains. So that even if wages rise, unit labour costs fall, courtesy of higher productivity.
  3. PIMCO the new Moody’s?

    PIMCO is voicing concerns that the market has voiced for months. Have PIMCO lost touch – like Moody’s, S&P and Fitch? These three musketeers merely parrot what the market has been saying for months…


Three separate surveys of economic activity in the mainland have raised doubts about the strength of the recovery there. The official May manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index came in at 50.1, unchanged from April. New orders were weaker and business activity expectations dropped to 4 month lows. In the steel sector new orders had their biggest monthly fall on record.

The private Caixin manufacturing PMI index slipped to 49.2 in May, from 49.4 in April. A reading below 50 indicates contraction and this is now the 15th consecutive month of contraction.

In a third survey, activity in China's services industry dropped to 53.1 in May, from the previous month's 53.5 reading.

In response the PBOC set the yuan fixing at a 5 year low for the third day in a row.

  1. Shonkynomics

      China deals in false precision, so pointing to the false precision of PMIs’ “definite” numbers is shonky. 
  2. Fuzzynomics

    Better just to stick with Hayek’s pattern predictions especially in China. Her  Economic Time® is characterised by an
    1. Excess demand for money, and an
    2. Excess supply of goods.
    3. This means that

                                         i.    There is little spare money left for investing in the stock market, and

                                        ii.    There is little incentive to invest in stocks when that excess supply of goods points to a shonky profits outlook.

  1. Pattern predictions

     This suggests that Beijing will seek to loosen FISCALLY even more!
    1. Keynes can do.  Contrary to the West, Keynes works in China, where the population at large still are willing to don picks and shovels in order to build roads, bridges, belts and other accoutrements….
    2. Monetary policy ineffectual. But to loosen monetarily won’t work: banks are leery of lending when the Economic Time® suggests an excess supply of goods already. Bankers will ask themselves: how can loans be repaid if profits are not growing on account of this excess supply of goods?


The Nikkei-Markit manufacturing purchasing managers’ index for Vietnam rose to 52.7 in May, a rise of 0.4% from April. Factory output rose and new orders hit a 12 month high.

  1. Economic Time®

    looking good: excess demand for goods implies improving profits outlook, so buy the market
  2. Addition, not replacement!

      Having looked into what motivates direct investment, it is clear to me that the key driver has to be to “stay close to the customer”.
    1. China. Well, China has had her fill of FDI in the basic industries; besides, rising incomes means that she gradually is transitioning to a services economy.
    2. Viet Nam. Here, per capita incomes and thus living standards are still way behind, as they are for so much of SE Asia (SEA)….So VietNam offers a cheap and cheerful manufacturing springboard to focus on the demand for all of SEA.

    3. And-and.Thus, think in terms of “and –and”, not “either – or” when it comes to FDI… It’s, therefore, China AND VietNam, NOT “China OR VietNam”!


Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has decided to delay an increase in the country’s sales tax until October 2019 in order to aid the economic recovery. The consumption tax was due to rise from 8 to 10% in April next year. The news sent the yen 1% higher and the Nikkei 225 index of Japanese stocks 1.6% lower.

  1. Abe was stupid

    He was stupid even to consider raising the sales tax (ST); his experience of a couple of years ago should have averted such stinking thinking.
  2. Or was he?

    Perhaps he put that ST out there as a red herring, as a bargaining chip that he could forfeit in order to get other favours off the Diet?
  3. Reform mausoleum

    Just like Europe is a welfare museum, Japan is a reform mausoleum: labour markets remain incredibly closed, as do goods markets….. so how can the place grow without competition?


  • Year to date the world’s best performing asset classes in USD terms are;

WTI (+33%), Brazilian equities (+23%), Brent (+19%), Russian equites (+19%), Silver (+15%), Gold (+15%) and Corn (+13%)

  1. Gold

    See gold as an insurance policy – not as an investment!

Geo-political tensions. With all of that global muck going on in the defence theatre (Muddle East, South China Sea, East China Sea, migrants, Russia goading NATO in Turkey….) – gold’s outlook is good

Stronger dollar. But the stronger dollar means that some non-dollar demand for gold will get dented.

Outlook. Gold is a buy – esp for dollar investors.

  • The world’s worst performing asset classes ytd are not good news for us here;

Shanghai Comp (-19% USD terms), Italian equities (-12% USD),   European banks (-12%) and the Hang Seng Index (-5%)

  1. China/HK

    China is not performing because of her debilitating Economic Time. And HK is the water skier off the back of the Chinese speed boat: if China slows, so do we.

Outlook.  Do not touch China/HK until China’s Economic Time® improves later this year….

You can listen to the radio show podcast here. Enjoy!

Share this post:


The information, including but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material contained on this blog are for informational purposes only and do not necessarily reflect the views or Enzio von Pfeil. The purpose of this blog is to promote broader understanding, knowledge and awareness of various financial and economic topics. It is not intended to be a substitute for regulated professional investment advice. Always seek the advice of your a regulated investment advisor with any questions you may have regarding your specific investment needs or concerns.

Enzio von Pfeil does not recommend or endorse any strategies or ideas mentioned in this blog. Reliance on any information appearing in this blog is solely at your own risk.


Any information provided to you by us, including any promotional material such as photographs, written descriptions, any plans or models, any income estimates or projections (“Information”) have been provided to us by other sources and although we aim to perform due diligence on all information we provide to our Blog subscribers, the Information is provided for general purposes only, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the Information and we do not make any representations, either express or implied, as to the accuracy as to the Information. We recommend that our Blog subscribers undertake their own due diligence in relation to the asset they are considering purchasing, including seeking independent legal and financial advice in relation to their own financial objectives and personal circumstances, prior to signing any agreement or contract with any third parties.

No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy, likelihood of achievement or reasonableness of any figures, forecasts, prospects or returns (if any) contained in the message. Such figures, forecasts, prospects or returns are by their nature subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies. The assumptions and parameters used by ( are not the only ones that might reasonably have been selected and therefore does not guarantee the sequence, accuracy, completeness or timeliness of the information provided herein. None of, its members or any of their employees or directors shall be held liable, in any way, for any claims, mistakes, errors or otherwise arising out of or in connection with the content of any form of communication, documentation included in the Blog, via e-mail or any other form of communication.

You are reminded that the content is for personal use and general information only. Under no circumstances is the content intended for and hence the content should not be regarded as an offer or solicitation or recommendation to dispose/sell, an offer or solicitation or recommendation to subscribe in, nor an offer or solicitation or recommendation to buy/acquire and under no circumstances should the content be constituted as provision of any recommendation or investment advice on any securities, investment products, investment arrangements and any other form of investments or legal, tax or other professional advice and therefore should not be relied upon in that regard for making any decision. Unless specifically stated, neither the information nor any opinion contained herein constitutes as an advertisement, an invitation, a solicitation, a recommendation or advice to buy or sell any products, services, securities, futures, options, other financial instruments or provide any investment advice or service by

Unless stated otherwise, any opinions or views expressed in this communication may not represent those of Opinions or views expressed in this communication may differ from those of other departments or third parties, including any opinions or views expressed in any research issued by

Any e-mail and any accompanying attachments are not encrypted and cannot be guaranteed to be secure, complete or error-free as electronic communications may be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, delayed or incomplete, and/or may contain viruses., therefore, does not accept any liability for any interception, corruption, loss, destruction, incompleteness, viruses, errors, omissions or delays in relation to this electronic communication. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. Electronic communications carried within the system may be monitored. Any communication or message in email form or otherwise may contain confidential information. Any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of the relevant information outside the original recipients of any messages  is strictly prohibited. If you receive a message by mistake, please notify the sender by reply email immediately and permanently delete the emails and its contents. Unless otherwise stated, any communication provided is solely for information purposes only.